Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 16:18

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Log in to your Samsung account by the end of next month or forever hold your peace - Android Police
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Subway owner buys popular chicken chain in $1 billion deal - PennLive.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What can I do to deal with disrespectful children?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Harvard doctor lists 6 cancer causing foods: What are their alternatives - Times of India
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Why do most Indian women cuckold or cheat on their husbands?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Guest column | Ask a Vet: Why does my pet lick me so much? - The Washington Post
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.